Published 13 May 2026
Every carrier in the UK is selling 5G as the solution to everything. Faster speeds, lower latency, fixed wireless access to replace fibre, backup connectivity that is "just as good as wired." The marketing material is polished. The coverage maps are optimistic. And the reality on the ground, when you actually have to build a network that cannot go down, is considerably more nuanced than any of it suggests.
This article is about the engineering side of 5G failover. Not the sales pitch, but the design patterns that actually work when you are building mission-critical connectivity for broadcast, maritime, live events, public safety, or enterprise sites where downtime has a measurable cost. We deploy these patterns daily using Peplink hardware and SpeedFusion, and what follows is drawn from that field experience.
Understanding what 5G actually gives you in the UK
Before designing a failover architecture around 5G, you need to understand what 5G really is in practice. There are two fundamentally different flavours of 5G deployed in the UK right now, and they behave very differently.
Sub-6 GHz (the one you will actually use)
The vast majority of 5G coverage in the UK uses sub-6 GHz spectrum, primarily in the 3.4 to 3.8 GHz band (often called n78). Three, EE, Vodafone and O2 all hold spectrum in this range. In terms of real-world performance, sub-6 GHz 5G delivers download speeds of roughly 100 to 300 Mbps in good conditions, with upload speeds between 20 and 50 Mbps. Latency sits around 15 to 30 ms to the first hop.
Those numbers are better than 4G, but they are not the transformational leap that marketing departments would have you believe. On a good 4G site with carrier aggregation, you can already achieve 80 to 150 Mbps down. The improvement from 5G sub-6 is real but incremental, not revolutionary.
The propagation characteristics of sub-6 GHz 5G are broadly similar to upper-band 4G. It penetrates buildings reasonably well, works at distances of a few kilometres from the mast, and does not require line of sight. For failover design, this means you can treat sub-6 GHz 5G much like a faster version of 4G. The same antenna placement rules apply, the same site survey principles hold, and the same environmental factors (foliage, building materials, distance to mast) affect performance.
mmWave (the one the marketing team loves)
Millimetre wave 5G operates above 24 GHz (typically 26 GHz in the UK). It delivers extraordinary speeds in ideal conditions: 1 Gbps or more is technically possible. But the propagation characteristics make it almost useless for failover design in the majority of real-world scenarios.
mmWave does not penetrate walls. It does not penetrate windows with metallic coatings (which is most modern commercial glazing). It struggles with rain. It requires near line of sight to the cell, and coverage drops off sharply beyond 200 to 300 metres. In the UK, mmWave deployments are extremely limited, confined to a handful of dense urban areas and specific venues.
For mission-critical failover, mmWave is not a technology you should design around unless you are operating in a fixed location with a guaranteed line-of-sight path to a known mmWave cell and you have tested it extensively. Even then, you would still need a sub-6 GHz or 4G fallback for the times when atmospheric conditions degrade the mmWave link.
The practical conclusion: design your 5G failover around sub-6 GHz. Treat mmWave as a bonus if it is available, never as a primary or sole backup path.
Failover topologies
There are three fundamental patterns for integrating 5G into a resilient network. Which one you choose depends on your downtime tolerance, your budget, and what your primary WAN connections look like.
Pattern 1: Active-passive failover
This is the simplest and most common pattern. Your primary WAN is fibre, leased line, or broadband. Your 5G connection sits idle (or near-idle) until the primary fails, at which point traffic cuts over to cellular.
On Peplink hardware, you configure this by setting WAN priority. The fibre connection gets priority 1; the 5G cellular modem gets priority 2. The router monitors the health of the primary link and, when it detects a failure, promotes the 5G connection to active status.
The critical question with active-passive is: how fast does the failover happen, and how do you detect failure?
A naive health check (ping the gateway every 30 seconds) might take 60 to 90 seconds to detect a failure. During that window, your users see packet loss and timeouts. For a standard office, that might be acceptable. For a live broadcast or a trading floor, it is not.
Peplink's health check system allows you to tune this aggressively. You can set DNS lookup checks against multiple targets, ICMP pings at 5-second intervals with a failure threshold of two consecutive misses, and HTTP checks against known-good endpoints. With this configuration, detection time drops to 10 to 15 seconds, and actual failover (including cellular modem connection establishment if the modem was in standby) takes 15 to 30 seconds total.
If you need faster failover than that, you need to move to an active-active pattern or keep the cellular modem in an always-connected state. Peplink supports a "standby" mode where the modem maintains its cellular registration but does not pass user traffic. This eliminates the modem connection time from the failover window, bringing total switchover down to under 10 seconds.
When to use active-passive: budget-constrained sites where some downtime during failover is acceptable. Small offices, retail locations, branch sites with non-real-time workloads. Also useful where your cellular data plan has a monthly cap and you want to minimise usage during normal operation.
Pattern 2: Active-active bonding with SpeedFusion
This is the pattern for mission-critical deployments. Both your primary WAN and your 5G connection are active simultaneously, bonded together through a SpeedFusion tunnel to a FusionHub or a remote Peplink peer.
In this configuration, traffic flows across both links at all times. If the fibre fails, the 5G link absorbs the full load without any user-visible interruption. There is no failover event, no detection window, no switchover delay. The SpeedFusion tunnel simply stops sending packets down the dead path and continues on the surviving link. From the perspective of a TCP session, nothing happened.
SpeedFusion hot failover in bonding mode achieves sub-second failover. The tunnel sends duplicate packets across both paths (or uses forward error correction, depending on configuration), so even the first packet after a link failure arrives successfully via the surviving path. For VoIP, video conferencing, RDP sessions, and live media feeds, this is the difference between a call drop and a uninterrupted experience.
The trade-off is cost and complexity. You need a SpeedFusion endpoint to bond to, either a FusionHub instance in a data centre or cloud (AWS, Azure, or a colocation facility) or another Peplink router at a remote site. You also consume data on both links simultaneously, which means your 5G data plan needs to accommodate the baseline traffic load, not just emergency failover traffic.
For broadcast and live events, active-active bonding is the standard pattern. A typical outside broadcast setup uses a Peplink MAX Transit with dual 5G modems, bonded via SpeedFusion to a FusionHub in a London data centre. The broadcast feed runs as a bonded stream across both modems plus any available wired connection. If one carrier drops (and cellular carriers do drop, especially at crowded events where the local cell is congested), the stream continues without interruption.
When to use active-active bonding: live broadcast, real-time telemetry, remote production, trading floors, surgical telementoring, any application where a single dropped packet or a 10-second outage is unacceptable. Also the right choice for mobile deployments (vehicles, vessels) where no single cellular link is reliable enough on its own.
Pattern 3: N+1 redundancy
N+1 is the pattern for organisations that need to survive not just a single link failure but a carrier-level outage, a regional network problem, or a simultaneous failure of multiple WAN connections.
The basic idea: you have N connections that can carry your full traffic load, plus one additional connection for redundancy. In a typical N+1 cellular design, you might have three 5G connections (on three different carriers) plus one fibre connection, with SpeedFusion bonding across all four. Any single connection can fail without impact. Two connections can fail and you still have enough bandwidth. Only a simultaneous failure of three out of four paths would degrade service.
This pattern is common in public safety, defence, and maritime deployments. A Peplink MAX HD4 with four cellular modems on four different carriers, bonded via SpeedFusion, provides this level of resilience in a single device. For fixed sites, a Balance 380X or Balance 580X with dual onboard modems plus additional USB cellular modems or WAN connections achieves the same topology.
The key design consideration with N+1 is carrier diversity, which deserves its own section.
Carrier diversity: why one operator is never enough
If you are designing mission-critical cellular failover and all your SIMs are on the same carrier, you do not have redundancy. You have multiple instances of the same single point of failure.
Cellular networks fail. They fail more often than most people realise. Mast outages, core network faults, HLR failures, interconnect problems, software updates gone wrong, power failures at cell sites. When EE has an outage in your area, every EE SIM in your router goes down simultaneously. It does not matter that you have four of them.
For genuine resilience, you need SIMs on at least two different carriers, preferably three. In the UK, there are effectively four mobile network operators at the infrastructure level: EE (BT), Three, Vodafone, and O2 (VMO2). MVNOs like giffgaff, Tesco Mobile, and Sky Mobile use the infrastructure of one of these four, so they do not add diversity. giffgaff on O2 and O2 itself will fail at the same time.
A solid carrier diversity strategy for a mission-critical UK deployment uses SIMs from at least three of the four operators. This protects against any single carrier outage. If you also have a wired WAN connection (fibre, leased line), you now have four independent failure domains, which gives you very high availability.
There is a subtlety here worth noting. In some rural areas, carriers share infrastructure through MORAN (Multi-Operator Radio Access Network) agreements. Vodafone and O2 share rural masts under the CTIL joint venture, meaning a power failure at a shared mast takes out both carriers simultaneously. Three and EE do not currently share masts in the same way, though EE does have its own extensive rural network through the Emergency Services Network build. The practical implication: if you are deploying in a rural area, check whether your chosen carriers share the local mast. If they do, your apparent diversity may be less than you think.
SIM selection and band locking
Peplink routers give you granular control over which SIM is active and which cellular bands the modem connects to. Used well, these controls significantly improve failover reliability. Used badly, they can make things worse.
SIM failover vs SIM switching
On a Peplink device with a dual-SIM modem (like the MAX Transit 5G), you can configure SIM failover so the modem automatically switches from SIM A to SIM B when it detects a problem. The detection can be based on signal quality, data throughput, or connectivity checks. This is useful when SIM A and SIM B are on different carriers, giving you intra-modem carrier diversity.
However, SIM switching is not instantaneous. The modem has to detach from one network, re-register on the other, and establish a data session. This process takes 15 to 45 seconds depending on the carrier and network conditions. During that time, the modem is offline. If you are relying on a single modem for failover, that 15 to 45 seconds adds to your total outage window.
For critical applications, the better approach is to use separate modems for each carrier rather than relying on SIM failover within a single modem. A MAX Transit Duo Pro with two independent modems, each locked to a different carrier, provides genuinely parallel connectivity with no SIM switching delay.
Band locking: when and why
By default, cellular modems select the best available band automatically based on signal strength and network conditions. Most of the time, this works well. But there are situations where manual band locking improves reliability.
The most common scenario: a modem keeps bouncing between 5G and 4G. The 5G signal is marginal, so the modem connects to 5G, gets poor throughput, drops back to 4G, sees the 5G signal again, reconnects to 5G, and repeats the cycle. Each transition causes a brief interruption. Locking the modem to 4G-only (or 5G-only, if the signal is adequate) eliminates the hunting and gives you a stable, predictable connection.
Another common case: at a crowded event or in a dense urban area, the modem connects to a congested n78 5G cell when a less-loaded n1 or n3 5G cell (or even a Band 20 4G cell) would provide better actual throughput. Band locking lets you force the modem onto the better-performing frequency.
Peplink's InControl 2 lets you push band-locking profiles remotely, which is valuable for large-scale fleet deployments where you cannot physically access every device. You can also configure band-locking schedules, switching between profiles based on time of day or location.
A word of caution: band locking reduces the modem's ability to adapt. If you lock to a specific band and the cell on that band goes offline, the modem will not fall back to another band. Only use band locking when you have tested the target band at the deployment location and confirmed it provides reliable service. In a failover design, you might lock the primary modem to a known-good band for stability, while leaving the backup modem in automatic mode for maximum adaptability.
Health check configuration
The health check is the mechanism that drives failover decisions. Get it wrong and you either fail over too slowly (users experience extended outages) or too aggressively (the router flaps between connections, causing instability). Peplink gives you several health check methods, and the right combination depends on your deployment scenario.
DNS lookup checks
This is the most reliable general-purpose health check. The router sends a DNS query to a specified server and expects a valid response within a timeout window. DNS checks work well because they test the full data path (the cellular modem, the carrier's core network, internet routing, and the DNS server itself) without generating significant traffic.
Configure DNS checks against at least two independent DNS servers. Using only one server means a DNS server outage triggers a false failover. Good choices are 1.1.1.1 (Cloudflare), 8.8.8.8 (Google), and 9.9.9.9 (Quad9). Set the check interval to 5 seconds and the failure threshold to 3 consecutive failures. This gives you a detection time of 15 seconds with good protection against false positives.
HTTP checks
HTTP checks send an HTTP GET request to a specified URL and verify the response code and optionally the response body. They are more thorough than DNS checks because they test Layer 7 connectivity, but they generate more traffic and are slower to execute.
HTTP checks are particularly useful when you need to verify connectivity to a specific service, not just generic internet access. For example, if your critical application is hosted in AWS eu-west-2, you might run an HTTP check against a lightweight health endpoint in that region. This catches scenarios where the internet works fine in general but the path to your specific service is broken.
ICMP (ping) checks
Ping checks are simple and fast, but they are also the most likely to produce false positives. Many networks rate-limit or drop ICMP traffic, and some carriers deprioritise ping responses on congested cells. A ping check might report a link as down when it is actually working fine for TCP and UDP traffic.
Use ICMP checks as a supplement to DNS or HTTP checks, not as the sole health check method. They are useful for detecting complete link failures quickly (a link that returns no ICMP responses at all is definitely down), but they should not drive failover decisions on their own.
Tuning for your failure tolerance
The trade-off with health check tuning is always speed vs stability. Aggressive settings (short intervals, low failure thresholds) detect failures quickly but risk false failovers. Conservative settings (long intervals, high failure thresholds) are more stable but mean longer outages before failover triggers.
For a standard office with active-passive failover, conservative settings are usually right: 10-second intervals, 3 failure threshold, giving a 30-second detection window. For a live broadcast with active-active bonding, you want aggressive settings: 3-second intervals, 2 failure threshold, giving a 6-second detection window. SpeedFusion's built-in path monitoring handles the rest.
SpeedFusion hot failover: how it actually works
SpeedFusion is the technology that makes sub-second failover possible. Understanding how it works helps you configure it correctly.
A SpeedFusion tunnel is established between two Peplink devices (or a Peplink device and a FusionHub). The tunnel can span multiple WAN connections simultaneously. Within the tunnel, SpeedFusion monitors each path independently, tracking latency, jitter, and packet loss in real time.
In hot failover mode, the tunnel maintains active state on all paths but sends traffic only through the designated primary path. If that path degrades or fails, traffic switches to the next path within one to two seconds. The key difference from router-level WAN failover is that SpeedFusion operates at the tunnel level, inside the encrypted session. TCP sessions are not disrupted because the tunnel endpoints do not change. The outer path changes, but the inner tunnel persists.
In bonding mode, SpeedFusion goes further. Traffic is distributed across all paths simultaneously, with packet-level load balancing. Each packet is sent down the path with the best current performance. If a path fails, the remaining paths absorb the load immediately. For protocols that are sensitive to packet reordering (which is most of them), SpeedFusion's WAN smoothing feature reorders packets at the receiving end, ensuring they arrive in sequence regardless of which path they took.
For the most demanding applications (live video, VoIP), SpeedFusion offers forward error correction (FEC). FEC sends redundant packets across multiple paths so that even if packets are lost on one path, the receiving end can reconstruct the original data. This adds overhead (typically 30 to 50 per cent more bandwidth consumption) but eliminates packet loss from the application's perspective.
The practical result: a properly configured SpeedFusion bond across a fibre connection and two 5G modems on different carriers can achieve zero-downtime failover for any single link failure and graceful degradation for a double failure. This is the standard we design to for broadcast and public safety deployments.
Combining 5G with other WAN technologies
5G is not a replacement for wired connectivity. It is a complement. The strongest failover designs combine multiple technologies with different failure modes so that no single event takes out all your connectivity.
5G + fibre
The most common combination for fixed sites. Fibre provides high bandwidth and low latency for normal operation. 5G provides independent failover that does not share the same physical infrastructure (no shared ducts, no shared last-mile provider). A fibre cut does not affect your 5G, and a cellular outage does not affect your fibre.
For sites with business-critical requirements, run fibre from two different providers entering the building through two different ducts. Add 5G on top of that for a third independent path. This gives you three failure domains: Provider A fibre, Provider B fibre, and cellular. A Peplink Balance 380X or 580X handles all three elegantly.
5G + 4G
On devices with multiple modems, running one modem on 5G and one on 4G provides technology diversity. 5G and 4G use different spectrum, different core network elements (in NSA mode, 5G piggybacks on 4G for control signalling, but in SA mode they are independent), and often different mast equipment. A 5G-specific fault will not take down your 4G fallback.
This is the standard approach for mobile deployments. A MAX Transit Duo Pro with one 5G modem on one carrier and one 4G modem on a different carrier provides dual-technology, dual-carrier diversity in a compact, DC-powered form factor.
5G + satellite
For deployments in areas with limited or no terrestrial connectivity (maritime, remote land sites, expeditionary deployments), combining 5G with satellite provides resilience across completely independent infrastructure. When you are within 5G or 4G coverage, the cellular link carries the traffic. When you move out of coverage, satellite takes over.
Peplink routers integrate natively with Starlink, OneWeb, and traditional VSAT terminals through the WAN port. SpeedFusion bonds the satellite link with any available cellular connections, smoothing out the variable latency of satellite (especially LEO satellite, which varies between 25 and 60 ms depending on satellite position) and providing failover between the two technologies.
The latency difference between 5G (15 to 30 ms) and LEO satellite (25 to 60 ms) is small enough that SpeedFusion's WAN smoothing can handle it without significant buffering. Bonding 5G with GEO satellite (550+ ms latency) is more challenging and typically requires asymmetric configuration where latency-sensitive traffic uses cellular and bulk transfers use satellite.
Real-world 5G performance expectations
Marketing numbers and real-world numbers are different things. Here is what we actually see in UK 5G deployments, measured across hundreds of sites.
Download speeds. Sub-6 GHz 5G: 80 to 250 Mbps typical, 300+ Mbps on a good site with strong signal and low congestion. At peak times in urban areas, 5G can drop to 30 to 60 Mbps, which is sometimes slower than 4G on the same carrier because more users are being funnelled onto the 5G cell.
Upload speeds. 15 to 50 Mbps typical. Upload is the bottleneck for many mission-critical applications (video contribution, remote production, CCTV backhaul). 5G upload is genuinely better than 4G upload (which typically maxes out at 15 to 25 Mbps), but it is still not comparable to fibre upload.
Latency. 15 to 30 ms to the carrier's core network in 5G SA mode. 20 to 40 ms in NSA mode (because the control plane still runs over 4G). These numbers are good but not transformational compared to 4G, which typically delivers 25 to 50 ms.
Reliability. This is the number that matters most for failover and it is the one the carriers never publish. In our experience, a 5G modem on a well-designed site (good antenna placement, strong signal, appropriate band selection) maintains its connection 99.5 to 99.8 per cent of the time. The remaining 0.2 to 0.5 per cent is made up of brief disconnections (modem re-registrations, cell handovers, network-side resets) that typically last 5 to 30 seconds each. Over a month, that is roughly 1 to 4 hours of micro-outages.
For a failover connection, 99.5 per cent availability is acceptable because the failover path only needs to work when the primary fails, and the probability of both failing simultaneously is very low if they are on independent infrastructure. For bonding, where the 5G link is active all the time, those micro-outages are handled transparently by SpeedFusion.
When 4G is still the better choice
5G is not always the right answer. There are several common scenarios where 4G remains the more reliable, more practical choice for failover connectivity.
Coverage. 4G covers approximately 92 per cent of UK geography by area (and 99 per cent by population). 5G covers roughly 30 to 40 per cent of the population and a much smaller fraction of geographic area. If your deployment site is outside a major urban centre, 4G may be the only cellular option, and it is a perfectly good one. A CAT-18 or CAT-20 4G modem with carrier aggregation across 4 or 5 bands delivers 100 to 200 Mbps down and 20 to 40 Mbps up, which is more than enough for most failover scenarios.
Building penetration. 4G's lower frequencies (800 MHz Band 20, 900 MHz Band 8) penetrate buildings far better than 5G's 3.5 GHz spectrum. If your router is inside a building without external antennas, 4G often provides a stronger, more stable signal. An indoor 4G signal of -85 dBm RSRP will outperform an indoor 5G signal of -105 dBm RSRP every time, even though 5G is technically "available" at that signal level.
Power efficiency. 5G modems draw more power than 4G modems. A 5G modem in active use draws 3 to 5 watts more than its 4G equivalent. For battery-powered or solar-powered deployments, this difference matters. A remote monitoring station running on a solar panel and battery might get three days of autonomy with a 4G modem but only two days with a 5G modem. In those deployments, 4G is the pragmatic choice.
Device cost. 5G-capable Peplink hardware costs more than 4G equivalents. A MAX Transit Pro with a CAT-20 4G modem is significantly less expensive than a MAX Transit 5G. If your failover bandwidth requirements are modest (under 100 Mbps), the 4G device provides everything you need at a lower price point.
Congestion. In dense urban areas during peak hours, 5G cells can be more congested than 4G cells because carriers are actively steering users onto 5G. Counterintuitively, the 4G network sometimes has more spare capacity. If your failover design prioritises reliability over peak speed, this is worth considering.
Hardware selection
Peplink offers several hardware platforms that support 5G failover designs. The right choice depends on whether you are building for a fixed site or a mobile deployment.
Mobile and temporary deployments
MAX Transit 5G. Single 5G modem, compact form factor, DC powered (12 to 48V). SpeedFusion throughput of 400 Mbps. This is the workhorse for vehicle-mounted and temporary-site deployments where you need one high-performance 5G link. Dual SIM support provides intra-modem carrier diversity.
MAX Transit Duo Pro. Dual independent modems. One or both can be 5G-capable. This is the recommended platform for mission-critical mobile deployments because it provides true dual-carrier, dual-modem diversity with no SIM switching delay. SpeedFusion bonds both modems, giving you sub-second failover between carriers.
MAX HD4. Four cellular modems in a rugged, vehicle-grade enclosure. For public safety, defence, and broadcast applications where you need N+1 redundancy with carrier diversity across four operators. SpeedFusion throughput of 400 Mbps. This device is the standard for armoured vehicles, fire tenders, and mobile command units.
Fixed-site deployments
Balance 380X / 580X. Dual onboard cellular modems (5G-capable), multiple WAN ports for fibre/broadband, SpeedFusion throughput of 400 to 1,000 Mbps depending on model. These are the right platforms for fixed sites that need a combination of wired and cellular WAN connections with full SpeedFusion bonding. The 580X handles larger sites with higher throughput requirements.
Balance with USB cellular. For sites where you need cellular failover but your primary Balance router does not have a built-in modem, Peplink's USB cellular adapters plug into the router's USB port and add a 4G or 5G WAN connection. This is a cost-effective way to add cellular backup to an existing installation without replacing the router. The USB adapter draws power from the router and is managed through the same interface.
For both mobile and fixed deployments, antenna selection matters as much as the router. An external MIMO antenna (4x4 MIMO for 5G sub-6 GHz) mounted on the roof or high on an exterior wall will dramatically outperform the router's built-in antennas. Budget for proper antennas and cable runs. The difference between an indoor router with stubby antennas and the same router with roof-mounted directional antennas can be 15 to 20 dB of signal gain, which translates to a 3x to 5x improvement in throughput.
Putting it all together: a design checklist
When designing 5G failover for a mission-critical network, work through these steps in order:
- Define your failure tolerance. How many seconds of outage can you accept? This determines whether you need active-passive, active-active bonding, or N+1 redundancy.
- Survey the site. Measure signal strength and throughput on each carrier. Do not rely on coverage maps. Test at the actual deployment location, at the actual time of day your operation runs, with the actual antenna configuration you plan to use.
- Select carriers for diversity. Choose SIMs from operators that do not share infrastructure at your location. Verify independence by checking mast sharing arrangements.
- Choose between 5G and 4G. If 5G signal is strong and stable, use it. If it is marginal, use 4G. A stable 4G connection beats an unstable 5G connection for failover reliability.
- Configure band locking where needed. Lock modems to known-good bands if you observe hunting or instability. Leave backup modems in automatic mode.
- Tune health checks. Match the check interval and failure threshold to your outage tolerance. Use DNS checks as the primary method, supplemented by HTTP checks for service-specific validation.
- Set up SpeedFusion. For active-active designs, configure SpeedFusion bonding with FEC enabled for real-time traffic. For active-passive designs, configure SpeedFusion hot failover.
- Test failover. Physically disconnect each WAN connection in turn and measure the actual failover time. Verify that TCP sessions survive. Verify that VoIP calls continue without interruption. Do this before going live.
- Monitor continuously. Use InControl 2 to track link health, failover events, and cellular signal quality over time. A connection that works today may degrade as carrier network conditions change.
5G is a genuine improvement over 4G for many failover scenarios, but it is not magic. The carriers will not tell you about the coverage gaps, the congestion at peak hours, the building penetration limitations, or the difference between marketing throughput and actual throughput. Designing reliable 5G failover requires the same disciplined engineering that any mission-critical network demands: diverse paths, independent failure domains, aggressive monitoring, and tested failover procedures. The technology has improved. The engineering principles have not changed.
If you are planning a deployment and want to discuss the right topology for your specific requirements, get in touch. We design and deploy these architectures across broadcast, maritime, events, public safety, and enterprise environments, and we carry the full range of Peplink routers and accessories in our UK shop.